Simplified Walking Simulation for Tuning a Passive Controllable Ankle Foot Orthosis

Authors

  • Dimas Adiputra Institut Teknologi Telkom Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52435/complete.v2i2.166

Keywords:

PICAFO, gait control, PID, walking simulation, ankle velocity

Abstract

A passive controllable ankle foot orthosis (PICAFO) has been developed to treat foot drop on post-stroke patient by controlling the walking gait passively. PICAFO controls the gait by utilizing a proportional integral (PI) controller with an ankle velocity reference. The PI controller must be tuned before being implemented on PICAFO. However, controller tuning based on experimental trial and error is not suggested since it requires the user to use the untuned PICAFO. Therefore, a simplified walking simulation is developed to tune the PI controller using Simulink of MATLAB software. The simulation mainly consists of several parts, such as PI controller, brake model, ankle torque to velocity transfer function, ankle velocity reference, and constant external torque. The result shows that the PI controller can be tuned accordingly to subject’s body mass index (BMI) and the brake model to meet the system specification. In this case, when the subject’s BMI is 22.2 and the brake maximum torque is 1.938 Nm, the system can control the ankle velocity with settling time less than 20 ms. However, if there is an external torque that is outside the range of brake capacities, then the system cannot do the control task. Therefore, improvement in the brake design is necessary in the future to achieve ankle velocity control within wide range of external torque.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). The top 10 causes of death [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death

Guo S, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Yamamoto K. A VR-based self-rehabilitation system. 2016 IEEE Int Conf Mechatronics Autom. 2016;1173–8.

Bisio I, Garibotto C, Lavagetto F, Sciarrone A. When eHealth Meets IoT: A Smart Wireless System for Post-Stroke HomeRehabilitation. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2019 Dec 1;26(6):24–9.

Lawton M, Sage K, Haddock G, Conroy P, Serrant L. Speech and language therapists’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance construction and maintenance in aphasia rehabilitation post-stroke. Int JLang Commun Disord [Internet]. 2018;00:1–14. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1460-6984.12368

Hornby TG, Moore JL, Lovell L, Roth EJ. Influence of skill and exercise training parameters on locomotor recovery during stroke rehabilitation. Vol. 29, Current Opinion in Neurology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2016. p. 677–83.

Edwards MK, Rosenbaum S, Loprinzi PD. Differential Experimental Effects of a Short Bout of Walking, Meditation, or Combination of Walking and Meditation on State Anxiety Among Young Adults. Am J Heal Promot [Internet]. 2017;089011711774491. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0890117117744913

Allegra Mascaro AL, Conti E, Lai S, Di Giovanna AP, Spalletti C, Alia C, et al. Combined Rehabilitation Promotes the Recovery of Structural and Functional Features of Healthy Neuronal Networks after Stroke. Cell Rep [Internet]. 2019;28(13):3474-3485.e6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.0628. Adiputra D, Rahman MAA, Ubaidillah, Mazlan SA. Improving Passive Ankle Foot Orthosis System Using Estimated Ankle Velocity Reference. IEEE Access. 2020;8:194780–94.

Adiputra D, Ubaidillah, Mazlan S., Zamzuri H, Rahman MA. Fuzzy Logic Control for Ankle Foot Equipped With MagnetorheologicalBrake. J Teknol [Internet]. 2016;11:25–32. Available from: https://jurnalteknologi.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/7942

Kobayashi T, Orendurff MS, Singer ML, Gao F, Hunt G, Foreman KB. Effect of plantarflexion resistance of an ankle-foot orthosis on ankle and knee joint power during gait in individuals post-stroke. J Biomech [Internet]. 2018;75:176–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.034

Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement [Internet]. Vol. 2nd, Motor Control. 2009. 277 p. Available from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470549148%5Cnhttp://www.amazon.com/Biomechanics-Motor-Control-Human-Movement/dp/047144989X%5Cnhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9780470549148

Hidayatullah FH, Ubaidillah, Purnomo ED, Tjahjana DDDP, Wiranto IB. Design and simulation of a combined serpentine T-shape magnetorheological brake. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2019;13(3):1221–7.

Kikuchi T, Ikeda K, Otsuki K, Kakehashi T, Tanida S, Furusho J. Basic study on prediction of initial contact for intelligently controlled ankle foot orthosis (I-AFO). 2008 IEEE Int Conf Robot Biomimetics, ROBIO 2008. 2008;86–90.

Franklin G, Powell JD, Emami-Naeini A. Feedback control of dynamic systems. Vol. 6th, Pearson Higher Education. 2010

Downloads

Published

2022-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles