NASA-TLX Mental Workload Analysis of Agrarian Reform Access Field Staff at Kantor Pertanahan X

Authors

  • Aisyah Juliawulan Malahayati Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
  • Yulia Sawitri Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
  • Tachtassara Zulkarnain National Land Agency, Indonesia
  • Friesca Erwan Széchenyi István University, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52435/jaiit.v8i1.776

Keywords:

Agrarian Reform Access, Field Staff, Mental Workload, NASA-TLX, Workload Evaluation

Abstract

Agrarian Reform Access activities require field staff to integrate field and administrative responsibilities, including data collection, field verification, community coordination, data processing, mentoring, and report preparation. In public land administration, this integrated role requires a workload evaluation approach that can describe both the overall workload level and its dominant dimensions. This study applied the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) as a practical diagnostic method to assess the perceived mental workload of field staff at Kantor Pertanahan X and to formulate dimension-based improvement directions. A descriptive quantitative survey was conducted using a total sampling of all eight field staff members. The results showed an average NASA-TLX score of 89.88, indicating a high level of perceived mental workload; all respondents were classified in the high workload category, with scores ranging from 82.00 to 99.33. The dominant dimensions were Performance, Mental Demand, and Effort, suggesting that respondents perceived their workload most prominently in relation to program target achievement, cognitive processing of field and administrative data, and the effort required to complete interconnected tasks. These findings should be interpreted as descriptive perceived workload patterns rather than causal relationships. Compared with general workload evaluation approaches, NASA-TLX offers the advantage of identifying both aggregate workload and dimension-level profiles. The findings support targeted improvements in task distribution, work scheduling, reporting formats, technical support, and internal coordination in Agrarian Reform Access activities.

References

B. Bakhtiar, S. Syarifuddin, and M. P. Putri, “Pengukuran Beban Kerja Dengan Metode Full Time Equivalent Dan Penentuan Jumlah Tenaga Kerja Efektif Menggunakan Workload Analysis,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operation Management (JIEOM), vol. 4, no. 1, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.31602/JIEOM.V4I1.5332.

Y. D. Yanti, I. Muttaqin, and I. Trianiza, “Analisis Penentuan Jumlah Tenaga Kerja Dan Keluhan Rasa Sakit Dengan Menggunakan Metode Workload Analysis Dan SNQ,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operation Management (JIEOM), vol. 4, no. 2, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31602/JIEOM.V4I2.5938.

K. Krisjayanti, A. Febiyani, and A. Munang, “Analisis Beban Kerja Dan Kebutuhan Tenaga Kerja Pada UMKM Pembuatan Jenang Di Desa Pekaja Sokaraja,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operation Management (JIEOM), vol. 6, no. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31602/JIEOM.V6I2.11615.

D. N. Ali, S. Sutrisno, and B. Nugraha, “Penilaian Beban Kerja Mental pada Staff Karyawan Gudang di PT. Pupuk Kujang Cikampek dengan Pendekatan Metode National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX),” Angkasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 17, May 2024, doi: 10.28989/angkasa.v16i1.1877.

T. G. Pasaribu and A. E. Nugraha, “Identifikasi dan Analisis Beban Kerja Mental Karyawan menggunakan Metode NASA TLX di PT XYZ,” Jurnal Serambi Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.32672/JSE.V8I2.5736.

M. Taufiq, I. Hasanuddin, M. Iqbal, and F. Erwan, “Analyzing the Vibration Exposure to the Safety and Health at Workplace: A Case in the Urea Granulation Unit of the Fertilizer Factory,” Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–124, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.25077/JOSI.V20.N2.P115-124.2021.

D. J. Hardy and C. H. Hinkin, “Mental Workload in Neuropsychology: An Example With the NASA-TLX in Adults With HIV,” Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, vol. 3, p. 881653, May 2022, doi: 10.3389/FNRGO.2022.881653.

J. W. Hutson, A. E. Franklin, B. A. Rogers, and D. Walker, “Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations,” Clin. Simul. Nurs., vol. 95, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101607.

R. J. Putra and G. Putra, “Analisis Beban Kerja pada Operator Bagian Produksi dengan Menggunakan Metode NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) di PT. Ujong Neubok Dalam,” Jurnal Optimalisasi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 212–224, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.35308/JOPT.V7I2.4352.

N. B. Aranda, A. Sugiono, and A. Syakhroni, “Working Load Analysis of Mental Operator Web Printing Machine with Job Targets Using National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and Rating Scale Mental Effort at PT. Bawen Mediatama,” JAST: Journal of Applied Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 38–48, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.30659/jast.1.02.38-48.

D. A. Anggraini and I. Pratama, “Analisis Pengukuran Beban Kerja Pada Karyawan Service Advisor PT. Agung Automall Sutomo Menggunakan Metode NASA-TLX,” Jurnal Surya Teknika, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 468–473, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.37859/jst.v9i2.4334.

P. A. Nurriza, N. R. As’ad, and E. Achiraeniwati, “Perancangan Jam Kerja berdasarkan Beban Kerja Full Time Equivalent dan NASA–TLX pada Stasiun Kerja Printing PT. XYZ,” Bandung Conference Series: Industrial Engineering Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–96, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.29313/bcsies.v4i1.10262.

S. H. Aksu, A. Adem, E. Cakit, M. Dagdeviren, and W. Karwowski, "An Examination of the Interrelationships Among NASA-TLX Dimensions Utilizing the DEMATEL Method," PLOS ONE, vol. 20, no. 4, p. e0320638, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320638.

M. A. Barajas-Bustillos, A. A. Maldonado-Macias, M. A. Serrano-Rosa, J. L. Hernandez-Arellano, L. Llamas-Alonso, and O. Balderrama-Armendariz, “Impact of Experience on the Sensitivity, Acceptability, and Intrusive of Two Subjective Mental Workload Techniques: The NASA TLX and Workload Profile,” Work, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1265–1275, 2023, doi: 10.3233/wor-211324.

R. Hernandez, S. C. Roll, H. Jin, S. Schneider, and E. A. Pyatak, “Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) adapted for the whole day repeated measures context,” Ergonomics, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 960–975, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2006317.

M. Mohammadian, H. Parsaei, H. Mokarami, and R. Kazemi, “Cognitive Demands and Mental Workload: A Field Study of the Mining Control Room Operators,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08860.

A. Rahman, D. R. Jatnika, B. Ridhosari, and E. Aryani, “Comprehensive Analysis of Physical and Mental Workloads for Electronic Installation Workers Utilizing CVL and NASA-TLX at the Building X Construction,” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 555–562, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.18280/ijsse.150314.

V. Nino, D. Claudio, and S. M. Monfort, “Evaluating the Effect of Perceived Mental Workload on Work Body Postures,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 93, p. 103399, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103399.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Malahayati, A. J., Yulia Sawitri, Tachtassara Zulkarnain, & Friesca Erwan. (2026). NASA-TLX Mental Workload Analysis of Agrarian Reform Access Field Staff at Kantor Pertanahan X. Journal of Advances in Information and Industrial Technology, 8(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.52435/jaiit.v8i1.776

Issue

Section

Research Article